Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR VASANTJI BABAJI — 247/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH070003412026

Filing Number

247/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

247/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR

Judge

5-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206076250362

Police Station

VASAI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR VASANTJI BABAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 275 (committing an offense relating to provisions of poison/dangerous substances) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹100 or, in default, two days simple imprisonment. The court applied the principle established in Natwar Harchandra v. State to reduce the sentence below the minimum prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 275 (committing an offense relating to provisions of poison/dangerous substances) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charge. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹100 or, in default, two days simple imprisonment. The court applied the principle established in Natwar Harchandra v. State to reduce the sentence below the minimum prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case