PATEL PINABEN RAMABHAI vs Government of Gujarat — 51/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJMH070002682026
Filing Number
51/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
51/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL PINABEN RAMABHAI
Adv. C P THAKOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court partially allowed the applicant's plea to recover Rs. 3,521/- that was seized and frozen in an HDFC Bank account during a cyber crime investigation. The court ordered the return of the amount to the applicant's State Bank of India account, conditional upon furnishing a surety bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, with the understanding that the applicant must return it if any other claimant proves their interest in the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Feb-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2026
Summary The court partially allowed the applicant's plea to recover Rs. 3,521/- that was seized and frozen in an HDFC Bank account during a cyber crime investigation. The court ordered the return of the amount to the applicant's State Bank of India account, conditional upon furnishing a surety bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, with the understanding that the applicant must return it if any other claimant proves their interest in the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts