Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR PARBATJI GABHAJI — 127/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH070001882026

Filing Number

127/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR

Judge

5-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206076250230

Police Station

VASAI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR PARBATJI GABHAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 275 (offense related to a public servant's misconduct) based on the accused's voluntary confession. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and relying on precedent from Nathvar Harchand v. State, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until court rising (short-term custody) and a fine of ₹100, with an alternative punishment of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 275 (offense related to a public servant's misconduct) based on the accused's voluntary confession. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and relying on precedent from Nathvar Harchand v. State, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until court rising (short-term custody) and a fine of ₹100, with an alternative punishment of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case