AXIS BANK LIMITED AUTHORISED OFFICER MR BHAVESH UDASI vs PARMAR PIYUSHKUMAR MANUBHAI — 30/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJMH070001692026

Filing Number

30/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK LIMITED AUTHORISED OFFICER MR BHAVESH UDASI

    Adv. M V PARECHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR PIYUSHKUMAR MANUBHAI

  2. 2.MAKAWANA BHARATIBEN NARANBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijapur allowed Axis Bank's SARFAESI application to take possession of a mortgaged property worth Rs. 19,39,527/- after borrowers failed to repay dues of Rs. 16,93,121/- despite a 60-day notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to seize the property (Plot No. 20, Radhe Bunglows, Mehsana) within 90 days with police assistance, relying on precedent that magistrates need not adjudicate disputes but merely facilitate asset possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijapur allowed Axis Bank's SARFAESI application to take possession of a mortgaged property worth Rs. 19,39,527/- after borrowers failed to repay dues of Rs. 16,93,121/- despite a 60-day notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to seize the property (Plot No. 20, Radhe Bunglows, Mehsana) within 90 days with police assistance, relying on precedent that magistrates need not adjudicate disputes but merely facilitate asset possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case