Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR MADHIBEN ADAJI BECHARJI — 6/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH070000132026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR

Judge

5-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206079250167

Police Station

LADOL POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR MADHIBEN ADAJI BECHARJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 275 (offenses related to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of Rs. 100 instead of the minimum statutory punishment, with an alternative of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 275 (offenses related to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the accused's clean criminal record, economic circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of Rs. 100 instead of the minimum statutory punishment, with an alternative of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case