RAKESHKUMAR BHIKHABHAI PATEL vs SUSHILABEN PRALADBHAI VANKAR Advocate - A H PARMAR — 88/2015

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMH060027612015

Filing Number

88/2015

Filing Date

24-Mar-2014

Registration No

88/2015

Registration Date

24-Mar-2014

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESHKUMAR BHIKHABHAI PATEL

    Adv. B A NAYAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILABEN PRALADBHAI VANKAR Advocate - A H PARMAR

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 25-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 04-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 23-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 17-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 11-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 27-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 11-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 10-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 26-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 15-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 25-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 11-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 06-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 30-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 01-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 09-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 03-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 19-Aug-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 21-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 26-Jun-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 02-May-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 29-Mar-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 07-Mar-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 14-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 20-Jan-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 19-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 15-Nov-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 26-Sep-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 25-Aug-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 22-Jul-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 23-Jun-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 20-Jun-2022

    Restored

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 11-Jun-2019

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Order Summary The petition was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to pursue the case actively, did not file necessary arguments or documents despite being given multiple opportunities, and the sale deed conditions were already violated by the defendant. Additionally, the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought as the defendant had already completed the property transfer. The court rejected all six issues raised by the plaintiff and upheld the defendant's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  39. 11-Jun-2019

    Restored

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  40. 11-Jun-2019

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  41. 11-Jun-2019

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  42. 18-Apr-2019

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  43. 16-Mar-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  44. 05-Feb-2019

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  45. 29-Dec-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  46. 07-Dec-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  47. 01-Nov-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  48. 19-Sep-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  49. 30-Aug-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  50. 21-Jun-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  51. 05-Apr-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  52. 16-Feb-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  53. 10-Feb-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  54. 02-Jan-2018

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  55. 22-Dec-2017

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  56. 10-Nov-2017

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  57. 12-Sep-2017

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  58. 11-Jul-2017

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  59. 09-May-2017

    Issues

  60. 13-Feb-2017

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  61. 08-Dec-2016

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  62. 07-Oct-2016

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  63. 06-Sep-2016

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  64. 30-Jun-2016

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  65. 12-Apr-2016

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  66. 02-Mar-2016

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  67. 15-Jan-2016

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  68. 14-Jan-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  69. 24-Mar-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The petition was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to pursue the case actively, did not file necessary arguments or documents despite being given multiple opportunities, and the sale deed conditions were already violated by the defendant. Additionally, the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought as the defendant had already completed the property transfer. The court rejected all six issues raised by the plaintiff and upheld the defendant's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case