Parmar Maheshbhai Dadhyabhai vs Talati Cum Mantri Advocate - B.A.NAYAK — 40/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH060023812018
Next Hearing
14th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
40/2018
Filing Date
16-10-2018
Registration No
40/2018
Registration Date
16-10-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parmar Maheshbhai Dadhyabhai
Adv. S.I.PATEL
Respondent(s)
Talati Cum Mantri Advocate - B.A.NAYAK
Taluka Vikas Adhikari
Adv. R.J.DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 17-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 09-12-2025 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 07-11-2025 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 09-10-2025 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary Case: Rcs 40/2018 (Civil Revision) Outcome: The plaintiff's revision petition is allowed. The court set aside the disputed notice/order and directed the defendant organization to remove an illegal encroachment (referred to as a "zampa"/obstruction) that was blocking the plaintiff's access to an internal road within the Gitanjali Society in Visnagar. The court found the defendant organization had acted without proper authority in issuing notices and creating obstacles that violated the plaintiff's legitimate rights to use the society's internal roads, and ordered restoration of the plaintiff's access within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case: Rcs 40/2018 (Civil Revision) Outcome: The plaintiff's revision petition is allowed. The court set aside the disputed notice/order and directed the defendant organization to remove an illegal encroachment (referred to as a "zampa"/obstruction) that was blocking the plaintiff's access to an internal road within the Gitanjali Society in Visnagar. The court found the defendant organization had acted without proper authority in issuing notices and creating obstacles that violated the plaintiff's legitimate rights to use the society's internal roads, and ordered restoration of the plaintiff's access within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts