VHORA RAFIKMOHAMAD BABUBHAI vs PATEL HARESHKUMAR NATVARLAL Advocate - K A PATEL — 1733/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH060022612022

Filing Number

1733/2022

Filing Date

10-Oct-2022

Registration No

1733/2022

Registration Date

10-Oct-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VHORA RAFIKMOHAMAD BABUBHAI

    Adv. M S BILADIWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL HARESHKUMAR NATVARLAL Advocate - K A PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court convicted the accused, Patel Hareshkumar Tavarlal, under the Negotiable Instrument Act, Section 138, for issuing a cheque of Rs. 4,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 4,12,373 to the complainant within 60 days, with additional fine and imprisonment provisions if default occurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 18-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 10-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 03-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 08-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 29-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 15-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 02-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 12-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 21-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 10-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  27. 01-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  28. 09-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  29. 30-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 10-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1733/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused, Patel Hareshkumar Tavarlal, under the Negotiable Instrument Act, Section 138, for issuing a cheque of Rs. 4,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 4,12,373 to the complainant within 60 days, with additional fine and imprisonment provisions if default occurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case