PATEL HEMCHANDBHAI RAMJIBHAI vs PATEL GANESHBHAI VITTHALBHAI KEVALDAS Advocate - N M PARMAR — 67/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 12-May-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMH060012122022

Filing Number

67/2022

Filing Date

16-May-2022

Registration No

67/2022

Registration Date

16-May-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL HEMCHANDBHAI RAMJIBHAI

    Adv. G B BAROT

  2. 2.LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED PATEL HARJIBHA RAMJIBHAI(Legal Heir)

    Adv. G B BAROT2.

  3. 3.PATEL DIPAKBHAI HARJIVANBHAI

    Adv. G B BAROT

  4. 4.PATEL BHANUPRASAD RAMJIBHAI

    Adv. G B BAROT

  5. 5.PATEL KANTABEN D/O RAMJIBHAI NAGARBHAI

    Adv. G B BAROT

  6. 6.PATEL DAHIBEN D/O RAMJIBHAI NAGARBHAI

    Adv. G B BAROT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL GANESHBHAI VITTHALBHAI KEVALDAS Advocate - N M PARMAR

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 02-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 22-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 16-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 07-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 13-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 27-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 18-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 07-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 01-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 12-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 08-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 07-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 01-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 01-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 18-Jan-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The injunction application has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, prove irreparable loss, or demonstrate that the balance of convenience favored them, as they did not adequately show that the defendant's construction was illegal or created any hindrance to their property. However, both parties are ordered to maintain status-quo of the suit property until final disposal of the case, and the substantive dispute will be resolved after full trial with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 18-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 29-Dec-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 02-Dec-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 02-Nov-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 16-Oct-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 03-Oct-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 19-Aug-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 02-Aug-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 25-Jul-2023

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 12-Jun-2023

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 17-Apr-2023

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 20-Mar-2023

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 22-Feb-2023

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 21-Jan-2023

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 26-Dec-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 29-Nov-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 14-Oct-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 19-Sep-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 01-Sep-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 25-Aug-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 05-Aug-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  42. 28-Jul-2022

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  43. 12-Jul-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  44. 20-Jun-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  45. 10-Jun-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  46. 02-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 16-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The injunction application has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, prove irreparable loss, or demonstrate that the balance of convenience favored them, as they did not adequately show that the defendant's construction was illegal or created any hindrance to their property. However, both parties are ordered to maintain status-quo of the suit property until final disposal of the case, and the substantive dispute will be resolved after full trial with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case