Patel Kantibhai Kacharabhai vs Patel Amitkumar Shankarlal Advocate - J.S.CHAUDHARI — 30/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJMH060011532019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
30/2019
Filing Date
31-05-2019
Registration No
30/2019
Registration Date
31-05-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Patel Kantibhai Kacharabhai
Adv. B.A.NAYAK
Respondent(s)
Patel Amitkumar Shankarlal Advocate - J.S.CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court (Civil Revision Application No. 30/2018, Visnagar) ruled that the defendant must remove the video posted on their social media account as per the plaintiff's request under Section 33 of the relevant statute. The court found merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the objectionable content of the video and ordered its deletion. The judgment was pronounced on 17 March 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court (Civil Revision Application No. 30/2018, Visnagar) ruled that the defendant must remove the video posted on their social media account as per the plaintiff's request under Section 33 of the relevant statute. The court found merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the objectionable content of the video and ordered its deletion. The judgment was pronounced on 17 March 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts