PATEL PINKABEN GOVINDBHAI vs PATEL VISHNUBHAI UMEDBHAI Advocate - P.S.PATEL — 26/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 12. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH060009412016
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
26/2016
Filing Date
19-04-2016
Registration No
26/2016
Registration Date
19-04-2016
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL PINKABEN GOVINDBHAI
Adv. M S BILADIWALA
Respondent(s)
PATEL VISHNUBHAI UMEDBHAI Advocate - P.S.PATEL
PATEL MINABEM RAVJIBHAI
Adv. P.S.PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 14-08-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is a Gujarati civil court order concerning a property dispute. The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application for injunction (interim relief), restraining the defendants from transferring or encumbering the disputed property and preventing them from creating any impediment to the plaintiff's possession, while dismissing the defendants' counter-application. The court directed that the property remain unchanged pending final judgment, with detailed instructions on maintaining status quo and restrictions on third-party transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Gujarati civil court order concerning a property dispute. The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application for injunction (interim relief), restraining the defendants from transferring or encumbering the disputed property and preventing them from creating any impediment to the plaintiff's possession, while dismissing the defendants' counter-application. The court directed that the property remain unchanged pending final judgment, with detailed instructions on maintaining status quo and restrictions on third-party transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts