THAKOR MAGANJI CHHANAJI vs THAKOR BAKAJI @VINODJI KADAVAJI Advocate - C M PATEL — 91/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH060008112021
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
91/2021
Filing Date
16-03-2021
Registration No
91/2021
Registration Date
17-03-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
4-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THAKOR MAGANJI CHHANAJI
Adv. J.S.CHAUDHARI
THAKOR AMARAJI CHHANAJI
THAKOR HATHIJI CHHANAJI
BAIBABEN KADAVAJI THAKOR
THAKOR VARASANGJI KADAVAJI
THAKOR MUKESHJI KADAVAJI
THAKOR SITABEN KADAVAJI
THAKOR KALIBEN REVAJI
THAKOR VASANTIBEN REVAJI
THAKOR PAYALBEN REVAJI
THAKOR GANESHJI REVAJI
Adv. J.S.CHAUDHARI
Respondent(s)
THAKOR BAKAJI @VINODJI KADAVAJI Advocate - C M PATEL
THAKOR MUKESHJI KADAVAJI
THAKOR VIKRAMJI KADAVAJI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-11-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (Order No. 05) seeking establishment of ownership rights, recovery of possession, cancellation of a fraudulent deed, and a permanent injunction over a disputed agricultural land (Revenue Survey No. 572). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as critical facts regarding when the defendants acquired possession and the validity of ownership claims remained contested and unproven at the interim stage. The defendants' counter-suit was also rejected as time-barred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (Order No. 05) seeking establishment of ownership rights, recovery of possession, cancellation of a fraudulent deed, and a permanent injunction over a disputed agricultural land (Revenue Survey No. 572). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as critical facts regarding when the defendants acquired possession and the validity of ownership claims remained contested and unproven at the interim stage. The defendants' counter-suit was also rejected as time-barred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts