PANDYA (PANDIT) AJITBHAI DEVENDRAPRASAD vs DARJI NAYANABEN WD/O. VINODKUMAR NAROTTAMDAS Advocate - B A NAYAK — 25/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH060007182019
Next Hearing
14th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
25/2019
Filing Date
09-04-2019
Registration No
25/2019
Registration Date
09-04-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PANDYA (PANDIT) AJITBHAI DEVENDRAPRASAD
Adv. P B MEHTA
PANDYA AJITBHAI POWER OF ATORNY OF KOKILABEN RAJNIKANT MEHTA D/O. DEVENDRA NARANBHAI PANDYA (PANDIT)
Adv. P B MEHTA
PANDYA (PANDIT) AJITBHAI DEVENDRAPRASAD POWER OF ATORNY OF MINABEN DIVYAKUMAR DAVE
Adv. P B MEHTA
Respondent(s)
DARJI NAYANABEN WD/O. VINODKUMAR NAROTTAMDAS Advocate - B A NAYAK
DARJI PRANAVKUMAR VINODKUMAR
Adv. B A NAYAK
DARJI RUPALBEN VINODKUMAR
Adv. B A NAYAK
DARJI DIPTIBEN VINODKUMAR
Adv. B A NAYAK
DARJI JALPABEN VINODKUMAR
Adv. B A NAYAK
THE STATE OF GUJARAT COLLECTOR SHREE
Adv. K M JOSHI
CITY SURVEYE SUPTD. SHRI
Adv. K M JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 14-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 29-08-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court petition (R.C.S. No. 25/2019) filed by plaintiffs claiming to be legal heirs of a deceased property owner (Hiralal Devshankar) was allowed. The court recognized the plaintiffs as legitimate successors-in-interest of the original property owner and directed that possession of the disputed property (a residential structure) be maintained in their favor, with the court maintaining status quo regarding the property until final resolution of the underlying dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court petition (R.C.S. No. 25/2019) filed by plaintiffs claiming to be legal heirs of a deceased property owner (Hiralal Devshankar) was allowed. The court recognized the plaintiffs as legitimate successors-in-interest of the original property owner and directed that possession of the disputed property (a residential structure) be maintained in their favor, with the court maintaining status quo regarding the property until final resolution of the underlying dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts