PATEL MAHENDRAKUMAR SANKARLAL vs MODI NARENDRABHAI SOMALAL — 159/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH060002162020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
159/2020
Filing Date
20-01-2020
Registration No
159/2020
Registration Date
20-01-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL MAHENDRAKUMAR SANKARLAL
Adv. N.J.BHAVSAR
Respondent(s)
MODI NARENDRABHAI SOMALAL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 18-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 29-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused Modi Narendbhai Somalal under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque (No. 4448889) worth ₹1,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused had borrowed ₹5,00,000 from the complainant against social work and issued five cheques as repayment, but failed to honour them despite proper notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹1,00,000 compensation to the complainant plus costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused Modi Narendbhai Somalal under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque (No. 4448889) worth ₹1,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused had borrowed ₹5,00,000 from the complainant against social work and issued five cheques as repayment, but failed to honour them despite proper notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹1,00,000 compensation to the complainant plus costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts