MAHENDRAKUMAR KISHORBHAI PARMAR vs SHANTABEN WD./O PUJABHAI MOTIBHAI Advocate - P.B.MEHTA — 10/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMH060001732019

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

14th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10/2019

Filing Date

21-01-2019

Registration No

10/2019

Registration Date

21-01-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 1,

Petitioner(s)

MAHENDRAKUMAR KISHORBHAI PARMAR

Adv. V R PATEL

Respondent(s)

SHANTABEN WD./O PUJABHAI MOTIBHAI Advocate - P.B.MEHTA

M I S EXPERT VISNAGAR

Adv. B A NAYAK

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

06-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

22-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-10-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

01-09-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

31-07-2021
ORDER

Summary Case: R.C.S. No. 10/19 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal. The court held that the plaintiff had no prima facie case for relief, as the sale deed was unregistered and the plaintiff failed to establish proper ownership of the property. The court found the plaintiff's claim to be time-barred under the Limitation Act and rejected the request for government assistance under the Prime Minister Housing Scheme, as the plaintiff had not followed proper statutory procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case: R.C.S. No. 10/19 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal. The court held that the plaintiff had no prima facie case for relief, as the sale deed was unregistered and the plaintiff failed to establish proper ownership of the property. The court found the plaintiff's claim to be time-barred under the Limitation Act and rejected the request for government assistance under the Prime Minister Housing Scheme, as the plaintiff had not followed proper statutory procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case