PATEL FAKIRBHAI BHAGVANBHAI vs PATEL SHANKARBHAI MAGANBHAI Advocate - B A NAYAK — 118/2014
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 038. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH060001532014
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
118/2014
Filing Date
29-11-2006
Registration No
118/2014
Registration Date
29-11-2006
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL FAKIRBHAI BHAGVANBHAI
Adv. N C MEHTA
Respondent(s)
PATEL SHANKARBHAI MAGANBHAI Advocate - B A NAYAK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 22-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 17-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 10-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The case has been dismissed for default (dismissed for want of prosecution) as the plaintiff/petitioner and their counsel failed to appear on the scheduled date, while the defendant's counsel was present. The court directed that the case be disposed of with costs/fees imposed on the plaintiff for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The case has been dismissed for default (dismissed for want of prosecution) as the plaintiff/petitioner and their counsel failed to appear on the scheduled date, while the defendant's counsel was present. The court directed that the case be disposed of with costs/fees imposed on the plaintiff for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts