SHYAMJI RAMLOCHAN MOURYA vs SANGITABEN D/O CHHOTALAL MEHTA AND W/O MEHTA NAIMESHKUMAR NAROTTAMDAS Advocate - H R PATHAN — 4/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH050010312024
Filing Number
4/2024
Filing Date
22-Nov-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
22-Nov-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHERALU
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAMJI RAMLOCHAN MOURYA
Adv. D D SEJWANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANGITABEN D/O CHHOTALAL MEHTA AND W/O MEHTA NAIMESHKUMAR NAROTTAMDAS Advocate - H R PATHAN
-
2.NAIMESH KUMAR MEHTA
Adv. H R PATHAN
-
3.SUNILKUMAR NAROTTAMDAS MEHTA
Adv. H R PATHAN
-
4.JAIMIN S/O SUNILKUMAR MEHTA
Adv. H R PATHAN
Case History
-
13-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Jan-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for attachment before judgment under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The plaintiff failed to provide definite evidence that the defendant intended to dispose of or remove the property to obstruct decree execution; mere allegations were insufficient. Additionally, considering the negligible bank charge relative to the agreed property price of Rs. 1.61 crore, the court found the application lacked merit and dismissed it with costs to follow the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Nov-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Nov-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Oct-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Sep-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Sep-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Aug-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jul-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jul-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Jun-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-May-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-May-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
-
29-Apr-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Apr-2025
For Counter Affidavit
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Mar-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2024
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for attachment before judgment under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The plaintiff failed to provide definite evidence that the defendant intended to dispose of or remove the property to obstruct decree execution; mere allegations were insufficient. Additionally, considering the negligible bank charge relative to the agreed property price of Rs. 1.61 crore, the court found the application lacked merit and dismissed it with costs to follow the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts