BALOCH TAHIRHUSAIN ASHIKHUSAIN vs THAKOR SANJAYJI RAMESHJI Advocate - Z S SHAIKH — 637/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH050009612025

Filing Number

637/2025

Filing Date

29-Oct-2025

Registration No

637/2025

Registration Date

29-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHERALU

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALOCH TAHIRHUSAIN ASHIKHUSAIN

    Adv. M A BALOCH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR SANJAYJI RAMESHJI Advocate - Z S SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed Criminal Case No. 637/2025 after the complainant expressed unwillingness to proceed further with the case. The dismissal was ordered under Section 1 (Order under Section 1), with no costs imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 637/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Criminal Case No. 637/2025 after the complainant expressed unwillingness to proceed further with the case. The dismissal was ordered under Section 1 (Order under Section 1), with no costs imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case