JOSHI NIMESHCHAND RATILAL vs JOSHI HARSHADKUMAR DEVSHANKAR Advocate - R S YAGNIK — 29/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,5,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH050008972022
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
29/2022
Filing Date
18-10-2022
Registration No
29/2022
Registration Date
18-10-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHERALU
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOSHI NIMESHCHAND RATILAL
Adv. B A NAYAK
JOSHI JIGISHABEN NIMESHCHAN
Respondent(s)
JOSHI HARSHADKUMAR DEVSHANKAR Advocate - R S YAGNIK
JOSHI VIJAYPRASHAD REVASHANKAR
Adv. R S YAGNIK
JOSHI TUSHAR VIJAYPRASHAD
Adv. R S YAGNIK
JOSHI HARDIK VIJAYPRASHAD
Adv. R S YAGNIK
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 04-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 22-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 17-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 26-09-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application in Regular Civil Suit No. 29/2022. The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership over the disputed shop property because no registered deed or written agreement was executed to transfer title, as required under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to follow the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application in Regular Civil Suit No. 29/2022. The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership over the disputed shop property because no registered deed or written agreement was executed to transfer title, as required under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to follow the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts