CHAUDHRY HATHABHAI DUNGARBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 38/2017
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJMH050007792017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
38/2017
Filing Date
05-03-2007
Registration No
38/2017
Registration Date
05-03-2007
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHERALU
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUDHRY HATHABHAI DUNGARBHAI
Adv. J H PATEL
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
MARG MAKAN VISANAGAR
Adv. C S RAJPUT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed the claimants' Land Acquisition Reference (L.A.R.) cases, awarding them additional compensation of Rs. 192.98 per square meter for agricultural land acquired for the Sabarmati Saraswati Link Canal project in Gujarat. The court reasoned that while the original award of Rs. 10 per square meter was inadequate, the claimants were entitled to enhanced compensation based on comparable sales evidence and statutory provisions, including 30% solatium, 12% annual appreciation from notification date to award date, and interest at 9% for the first year and 15% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed the claimants' Land Acquisition Reference (L.A.R.) cases, awarding them additional compensation of Rs. 192.98 per square meter for agricultural land acquired for the Sabarmati Saraswati Link Canal project in Gujarat. The court reasoned that while the original award of Rs. 10 per square meter was inadequate, the claimants were entitled to enhanced compensation based on comparable sales evidence and statutory provisions, including 30% solatium, 12% annual appreciation from notification date to award date, and interest at 9% for the first year and 15% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts