Government of Gujarat vs DEVIPUJAK NARESHBHAI KESHABHAI SONABHAI — 195/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,. Disposed: Uncontested--STAND DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH050002892026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

195/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHERALU

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--STAND DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206023250608

Police Station

KHERALU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DEVIPUJAK NARESHBHAI KESHABHAI SONABHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court quashed the cognizance taken by the Magistrate for offences under sections 184 and 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, holding that the police investigation and charge sheet violated section 155(2) of the CrPC, which requires prior judicial permission for non-cognizable offences. The court concluded that since section 185 is a non-cognizable offence, the police could not initiate investigation without mandatory permission from the Magistrate, and therefore acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court quashed the cognizance taken by the Magistrate for offences under sections 184 and 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, holding that the police investigation and charge sheet violated section 155(2) of the CrPC, which requires prior judicial permission for non-cognizable offences. The court concluded that since section 185 is a non-cognizable offence, the police could not initiate investigation without mandatory permission from the Magistrate, and therefore acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHERALU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case