Government of Gujarat vs BAROT MEETKUMAR ASHOKBHAI AMBALAL — 136/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH050002102026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
136/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
136/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHERALU
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206023250625
Police Station
KHERALU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BAROT MEETKUMAR ASHOKBHAI AMBALAL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Kheralu convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (amended 2016) for possession and consumption of intoxicants. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 or 10 days simple imprisonment in default, finding that the prosecution failed to establish charges under Section 85(1) of the Act (drunk and disorderly behavior) but successfully proved the charge of illegal consumption of intoxicants. The court considered the accused's first offense status and lack of prior criminal history as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Kheralu convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (amended 2016) for possession and consumption of intoxicants. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 or 10 days simple imprisonment in default, finding that the prosecution failed to establish charges under Section 85(1) of the Act (drunk and disorderly behavior) but successfully proved the charge of illegal consumption of intoxicants. The court considered the accused's first offense status and lack of prior criminal history as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts