Government of Gujarat vs BAROT MEETKUMAR ASHOKBHAI AMBALAL — 136/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH050002102026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

136/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

136/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHERALU

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206023250625

Police Station

KHERALU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BAROT MEETKUMAR ASHOKBHAI AMBALAL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Kheralu convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (amended 2016) for possession and consumption of intoxicants. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 or 10 days simple imprisonment in default, finding that the prosecution failed to establish charges under Section 85(1) of the Act (drunk and disorderly behavior) but successfully proved the charge of illegal consumption of intoxicants. The court considered the accused's first offense status and lack of prior criminal history as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Kheralu convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (amended 2016) for possession and consumption of intoxicants. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 or 10 days simple imprisonment in default, finding that the prosecution failed to establish charges under Section 85(1) of the Act (drunk and disorderly behavior) but successfully proved the charge of illegal consumption of intoxicants. The court considered the accused's first offense status and lack of prior criminal history as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHERALU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case