SAIYAD NAJRANABIBI W/O SABBIRBHAI D/O IMAMMIYA ACHHAMIYA SAIYAD vs SAIYAD SABBIRBHAI ISMAILBHAI — 615/2025

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJMH030028322025

Filing Number

615/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

615/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIYAD NAJRANABIBI W/O SABBIRBHAI D/O IMAMMIYA ACHHAMIYA SAIYAD

    Adv. F J MANSURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAIYAD SABBIRBHAI ISMAILBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary In Criminal Petition No. 615/2025, the National Legal Adalat (Kadi-Mehsana) disposed of a Domestic Violence Act case on 14 March 2026. The petitioner had sought rent recovery under the Act, but the respondent fully paid the dues and the petitioner received the payment with acknowledgment. Since the petitioner withdrew the plea and no longer wished to pursue the matter, the court dismissed the petition based on the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 615/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Petition No. 615/2025, the National Legal Adalat (Kadi-Mehsana) disposed of a Domestic Violence Act case on 14 March 2026. The petitioner had sought rent recovery under the Act, but the respondent fully paid the dues and the petitioner received the payment with acknowledgment. Since the petitioner withdrew the plea and no longer wished to pursue the matter, the court dismissed the petition based on the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case