Government of Gujarat vs RAVAL SANJAYKUMAR @ THUTHIYO DILIPBHAI BHIKHABHAI Advocate - B C DESAI — 1318/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65 A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH030021782024
Filing Number
1318/2024
Filing Date
09-07-2024
Registration No
1318/2024
Registration Date
09-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KADI
Judge
2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206005240211
Police Station
BAVLU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAVAL SANJAYKUMAR @ THUTHIYO DILIPBHAI BHIKHABHAI Advocate - B C DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted accused Raval Sanjayakumar under Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2017, Section 65, finding him guilty of possessing illicit liquor. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹200/- with an additional 4-day imprisonment in default, and confiscated materials were ordered to be destroyed as per regulations. The judgment emphasized rehabilitative principles under Indian criminal law while imposing the penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted accused Raval Sanjayakumar under Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2017, Section 65, finding him guilty of possessing illicit liquor. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹200/- with an additional 4-day imprisonment in default, and confiscated materials were ordered to be destroyed as per regulations. The judgment emphasized rehabilitative principles under Indian criminal law while imposing the penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts