RABARI MANIBEN VISABHAI vs RABARI MENABEN VISABHAI Advocate - S D THAKOR — 40/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 133. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH030019542024
Filing Number
40/2024
Filing Date
15-Jun-2024
Registration No
40/2024
Registration Date
15-Jun-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KADI
Judge
3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RABARI MANIBEN VISABHAI
Adv. D G THAKOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.RABARI MENABEN VISABHAI Advocate - S D THAKOR
-
2.RABARI JAGMALBHAI VISHABHAI
Adv. S D THAKOR
-
3.RABARI NAVGANBHAI VISHABHAI
Adv. S D THAKOR
-
4.RABARI SHIBHAI VISABHAI
Adv. S D THAKOR
-
5.RABARI VIJAYBHAI SHANKARBHAI
Adv. M S VOHRA
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: Special Civil Suit No. 40/2024 (Mehsana District Court) Outcome: The plaintiff's interim relief petition (Application No. 5) seeking a temporary injunction order to declare the property ownership and prevent the defendant from interfering with possession is DISMISSED. The court found the plaintiff's claim lacks merit, as the property was validly sold to Defendant 5 through a registered deed in 2015, with proper revenue record entry. The plaintiff failed to establish grounds for interim relief, as no first appearance of right exists and the balance of convenience favors the defendant who has already acquired complete ownership rights. Additionally, the court noted the plaintiff's claim is time-barred under the three-year limitation period from the deed registration date. The costs of the case shall follow the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Feb-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Feb-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jan-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
13-Nov-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Oct-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Oct-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Aug-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2024
Court Order Summary Case: Special Civil Suit No. 40/2024 (Mehsana District Court) Outcome: The plaintiff's interim relief petition (Application No. 5) seeking a temporary injunction order to declare the property ownership and prevent the defendant from interfering with possession is DISMISSED. The court found the plaintiff's claim lacks merit, as the property was validly sold to Defendant 5 through a registered deed in 2015, with proper revenue record entry. The plaintiff failed to establish grounds for interim relief, as no first appearance of right exists and the balance of convenience favors the defendant who has already acquired complete ownership rights. Additionally, the court noted the plaintiff's claim is time-barred under the three-year limitation period from the deed registration date. The costs of the case shall follow the final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts