Government of Gujarat vs PANDYA SUBHASHCHANDRA NATVARLAL KALIDAS Advocate - B D PANDYA — 1056/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),351(2),352,54. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH030016232025

Filing Number

1056/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

1056/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206020250187

Police Station

KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),351(2),352,54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANDYA SUBHASHCHANDRA NATVARLAL KALIDAS Advocate - B D PANDYA

  2. 2.PANDYA NISHITBHAI SUBHASHCHANDRA NATVARLAL

  3. 3.PANDYA MAUNINBHAI SHUBHASHCHANDRA NATVARLAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Pandya Subhashchandra, Pandya Ninivitbhai, and Pandya Mauninbhai) of charges under BNS 2023 sections 115(2), 351(2), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault with steel pipes beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the complainant alleged the accused attacked him and his father with steel pipes following a neighborhood dispute, the witness testimonies, including the complainant's own account, were inconsistent and lacking credibility, particularly as the witnesses later reconciled with the accused and retracted their claims of injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 04-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1056/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Pandya Subhashchandra, Pandya Ninivitbhai, and Pandya Mauninbhai) of charges under BNS 2023 sections 115(2), 351(2), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault with steel pipes beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the complainant alleged the accused attacked him and his father with steel pipes following a neighborhood dispute, the witness testimonies, including the complainant's own account, were inconsistent and lacking credibility, particularly as the witnesses later reconciled with the accused and retracted their claims of injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case