Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR DIVABEN WD/O RATNAJI PUNAJI Advocate - A A SAIYAD — 366/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH030006542026

Filing Number

366/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

366/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

9-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206050250537

Police Station

NANDASAN POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR DIVABEN WD/O RATNAJI PUNAJI Advocate - A A SAIYAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court in Kadi convicted Thakor Divaben under Section 6P(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act. The defendant pleaded guilty and confessed to the charge; considering her poor economic circumstances and status as the sole breadwinner for her family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine instead of the maximum statutory punishment, with three days simple imprisonment as an alternative in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class Court in Kadi convicted Thakor Divaben under Section 6P(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act. The defendant pleaded guilty and confessed to the charge; considering her poor economic circumstances and status as the sole breadwinner for her family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine instead of the maximum statutory punishment, with three days simple imprisonment as an alternative in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case