Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR MAHESHJI ALIAS LALO RATNAJI Advocate - A A SAIYAD — 365/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH030006532026

Filing Number

365/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

365/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

9-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206050250214

Police Station

NANDASAN POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR MAHESHJI ALIAS LALO RATNAJI Advocate - A A SAIYAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Kadhi First Class Judicial Magistrate court convicted accused Thakor Maheshji @ Lalo Ratnaji under the Prohibition Act Section 65-P(A)(A), who pleaded guilty and admitted the offense. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 200 fine (instead of the statutory punishment) considering the accused's financial hardship, status as the sole breadwinner, and family responsibilities, with a three-day simple imprisonment as alternative punishment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Kadhi First Class Judicial Magistrate court convicted accused Thakor Maheshji @ Lalo Ratnaji under the Prohibition Act Section 65-P(A)(A), who pleaded guilty and admitted the offense. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 200 fine (instead of the statutory punishment) considering the accused's financial hardship, status as the sole breadwinner, and family responsibilities, with a three-day simple imprisonment as alternative punishment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case