Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR VASHIBEN DINESHJI ALIAS DINAJI MOHANJI Advocate - F D JOSHI — 354/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH030006412026

Filing Number

354/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

354/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

9-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR VASHIBEN DINESHJI ALIAS DINAJI MOHANJI Advocate - F D JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Kadi First Class Judicial Magistrate Court found Thakor Vashiben guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 6P(A)(A) (Case No. 354-2026). The accused confessed to the charge and submitted a mitigation plea citing her poor economic condition and sole earning status for the family. The court, considering these mitigating circumstances and relying on precedent law, sentenced her to a fine of ₹200 with three days simple imprisonment in default, and ordered destruction of seized alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 354/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Kadi First Class Judicial Magistrate Court found Thakor Vashiben guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 6P(A)(A) (Case No. 354-2026). The accused confessed to the charge and submitted a mitigation plea citing her poor economic condition and sole earning status for the family. The court, considering these mitigating circumstances and relying on precedent law, sentenced her to a fine of ₹200 with three days simple imprisonment in default, and ordered destruction of seized alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case