Government of Gujarat vs DANTANI AJAY ALIAS BHOTO SHAMBHUBHAI PRAHLADBHAI Advocate - F D JOSHI — 348/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH030006302026

Filing Number

348/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

348/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

9-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DANTANI AJAY ALIAS BHOTO SHAMBHUBHAI PRAHLADBHAI Advocate - F D JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Kadi First Class Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused Dantani Ajay guilty under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 200 fine and 3 days simple imprisonment instead of the statutory punishment, considering the accused's poor economic status and role as sole family earner, citing the Gujarat High Court precedent for leniency in such circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Kadi First Class Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused Dantani Ajay guilty under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession. The court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 200 fine and 3 days simple imprisonment instead of the statutory punishment, considering the accused's poor economic status and role as sole family earner, citing the Gujarat High Court precedent for leniency in such circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case