IRFAN USMANBHAI SIPAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 148/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJMH030004952026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

148/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

148/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,503,

Petitioner(s)

IRFAN USMANBHAI SIPAI

Adv. J A GANCHI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

BANK OF BARODA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

25-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

18-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

16-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
ORDER

The 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kadi partially allowed the applicant's application and ordered the return of Rs. 22,500 from a frozen bank account (out of Rs. 44,000 seized in a cyber crime case) to the applicant as interim custody, subject to furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the amount. The court relied on the Investigating Officer's positive opinion and Supreme Court precedent, with conditions that the applicant must produce the amount when ordered and return it if any other claimant proves their interest in the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kadi partially allowed the applicant's application and ordered the return of Rs. 22,500 from a frozen bank account (out of Rs. 44,000 seized in a cyber crime case) to the applicant as interim custody, subject to furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the amount. The court relied on the Investigating Officer's positive opinion and Supreme Court precedent, with conditions that the applicant must produce the amount when ordered and return it if any other claimant proves their interest in the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KADI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case