DINESHBHAI MAGANBHAI CHAVDA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 142/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJMH030004552026

Filing Number

142/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI MAGANBHAI CHAVDA

    Adv. B C DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

  2. 2.FINO PAYMENTS BANK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kadi partly allowed the applicant's application for return of Rs. 8,149 that was frozen in a cybercrime case, ordering its transfer back to the applicant's State Bank of India account upon furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount. The court granted this relief based on the Investigating Officer's positive opinion and Supreme Court precedent, subject to conditions that the applicant produce the amount when ordered and return it if any other person proves their interest in the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Process To Opponent

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Opponent

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kadi partly allowed the applicant's application for return of Rs. 8,149 that was frozen in a cybercrime case, ordering its transfer back to the applicant's State Bank of India account upon furnishing surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount. The court granted this relief based on the Investigating Officer's positive opinion and Supreme Court precedent, subject to conditions that the applicant produce the amount when ordered and return it if any other person proves their interest in the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case