Government of Gujarat vs PATEL NANDLAL VASHUDEVBHAI Advocate - A K PATEL — 151/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,324,323,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH030004422021
Filing Number
151/2021
Filing Date
03-03-2021
Registration No
151/2021
Registration Date
03-03-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, KADI
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
125
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PATEL NANDLAL VASHUDEVBHAI Advocate - A K PATEL
PATEL RAKESHBHAI ALIAS RAJDHAN MANUBHAI
PATEL KALPIT ALIAS BHOTIYO GHANSHYAMBHAI KASHIRAMDAS
PATEL PUNIT RAMCHANDRABHAI VASUDEV
PATEL PRADIPBHAI ALIAS JAY BHAGVAN KARSHANBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 24-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all five accused under the benefit of doubt for charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 403 and GP Act section 135. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged assault and intimidation; the complainant's testimony lacked credible supporting evidence, and the accused's reconciliation with the victims undermined the case narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all five accused under the benefit of doubt for charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 403 and GP Act section 135. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged assault and intimidation; the complainant's testimony lacked credible supporting evidence, and the accused's reconciliation with the victims undermined the case narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts