Government of Gujarat vs SEVAK(BRAHMAN) ANURAG ALIAS ANSU SHANKARLAL KORILALJI — 56/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH030001432026

Filing Number

56/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADI

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206020250880

Police Station

KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SEVAK(BRAHMAN) ANURAG ALIAS ANSU SHANKARLAL KORILALJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The court accepted the complainant's petition to compound (settle) the criminal case under CrPC Section 320 without requiring the accused's signature or physical presence, citing established legal principles that compounding is a unilateral right of the complainant and the accused's attendance is not mandatory. The court acquitted the accused of charges under BNS Section 303(2) and Section 54, and ordered the case to be closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 56/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the complainant's petition to compound (settle) the criminal case under CrPC Section 320 without requiring the accused's signature or physical presence, citing established legal principles that compounding is a unilateral right of the complainant and the accused's attendance is not mandatory. The court acquitted the accused of charges under BNS Section 303(2) and Section 54, and ordered the case to be closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case