RAMANBHAI KHODABHAI RAVAL vs VIVEK CHINTUKUMAR LALVANI Advocate - P D BRAHMBHATT — 434/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJMH010041312025

Filing Number

434/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

434/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

5-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMANBHAI KHODABHAI RAVAL

    Adv. P P RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK CHINTUKUMAR LALVANI Advocate - P D BRAHMBHATT

  2. 2.LALVANI DHANESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI

    Adv. P D BRAHMBHATT

  3. 3.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

    Adv. N R BHAVSAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Mahesana disposed of MACP No. 434 of 2025 by recording a compromise settlement between the applicant and Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. The court awarded Rs. 70,000 as compensation to be paid via account payee cheque after verification, with court fees to be refunded under Section 21 of the Legal Service Authorities Act, 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 434/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Mahesana disposed of MACP No. 434 of 2025 by recording a compromise settlement between the applicant and Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. The court awarded Rs. 70,000 as compensation to be paid via account payee cheque after verification, with court fees to be refunded under Section 21 of the Legal Service Authorities Act, 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case