SANJAYBHAI JAGDISHBHAI RAVAL vs VIVEK CHINTUKUMAR LALVANI Advocate - P D BRAHMBHATT — 433/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJMH010041302025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
433/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
433/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAYBHAI JAGDISHBHAI RAVAL
Adv. P P RAVAL
Respondent(s)
VIVEK CHINTUKUMAR LALVANI Advocate - P D BRAHMBHATT
LALVANI DHANESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI
Adv. P D BRAHMBHATT
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Adv. N R BHAVSAR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY | |
| 31-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The MACT (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) at Mahesana disposed of MACP No. 433 of 2025 by recording a compromise settlement between the applicant and Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. The tribunal approved a compensation amount of Rs. 3,00,000, with 60% to be invested in a fixed deposit for 5 years and the remaining 40% disbursed via account payee cheque, with restrictions on pledging the FD without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The MACT (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) at Mahesana disposed of MACP No. 433 of 2025 by recording a compromise settlement between the applicant and Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. The tribunal approved a compensation amount of Rs. 3,00,000, with 60% to be invested in a fixed deposit for 5 years and the remaining 40% disbursed via account payee cheque, with restrictions on pledging the FD without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts