RASHIKBHAI KESHUBHAI BADOR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 124/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJMH010037142025

Filing Number

124/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

124/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASHIKBHAI KESHUBHAI BADOR

    Adv. N R SORATHIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

  2. 2.THE MEHSANA URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

    Adv. P P SHAH

  3. 3.MIRACLE ENTERPRISE

    Adv. A Y BHATT

  4. 4.JAY.H.CHOTALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the petitioner's request for revision of the lower court's order, finding no grounds for interference. The court dismissed the revision petition as it determined that the trial court's decision to proceed with the case under Section 13 of the relevant act was legally sound, with no cost awarded against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Process To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    Process To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the petitioner's request for revision of the lower court's order, finding no grounds for interference. The court dismissed the revision petition as it determined that the trial court's decision to proceed with the case under Section 13 of the relevant act was legally sound, with no cost awarded against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case