SOLANKI MUKUNDSINGH KIRTISINGH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 571/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010036372025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

572/2025

Filing Date

07-11-2025

Registration No

571/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

SOLANKI MUKUNDSINGH KIRTISINGH

Adv. A I MANSURI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

RAVAL DUSHYANTKUMAR VASANTLAL

Adv. J P TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

FOR R&P

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

19-02-2026

FOR R&P

13-01-2026

FOR R&P

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Mahesana Sessions Court disposed of the criminal appeal as "Compromised" after both parties reached a settlement in a disputed cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court acquitted the appellant, quashed the trial court's conviction, and ordered Rs. 36,000 be paid to the complainant, following Supreme Court guidelines that prohibited imposition of costs or fines in compounded offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-11-2025
ORDER
13-11-2025
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mahesana Sessions Court disposed of the criminal appeal as "Compromised" after both parties reached a settlement in a disputed cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court acquitted the appellant, quashed the trial court's conviction, and ordered Rs. 36,000 be paid to the complainant, following Supreme Court guidelines that prohibited imposition of costs or fines in compounded offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case