SOLANKI MUKUNDSINGH KIRTISINGH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 571/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJMH010036372025
Filing Number
572/2025
Filing Date
07-Nov-2025
Registration No
571/2025
Registration Date
07-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOLANKI MUKUNDSINGH KIRTISINGH
Adv. A I MANSURI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE
-
2.RAVAL DUSHYANTKUMAR VASANTLAL
Adv. J P TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The Mahesana Sessions Court disposed of the criminal appeal as "Compromised" after both parties reached a settlement in a disputed cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court acquitted the appellant, quashed the trial court's conviction, and ordered Rs. 36,000 be paid to the complainant, following Supreme Court guidelines that prohibited imposition of costs or fines in compounded offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
For R&P
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
For R&P
Principal District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
For R&P
Principal District Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
For R&P
Principal District Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
For R&P
8th Addl District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Order
-
13-Nov-2025
Order
-
13-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 571/2025
Summary The Mahesana Sessions Court disposed of the criminal appeal as "Compromised" after both parties reached a settlement in a disputed cheque case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court acquitted the appellant, quashed the trial court's conviction, and ordered Rs. 36,000 be paid to the complainant, following Supreme Court guidelines that prohibited imposition of costs or fines in compounded offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts