THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ALPESHBHAI KANTILAL NARANDAS PATEL Advocate - N R RAVAL — 93/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 397,394,201,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJMH010035212025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
93/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
206
Police Station
B DIVISION POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. S R PATEL
Respondent(s)
ALPESHBHAI KANTILAL NARANDAS PATEL Advocate - N R RAVAL
DILIPBHAI KANTILAL REVABHAI PATEL
Adv. N R RAVAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 01-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Sessions Court in Mehsana acquitted both accused (Alpesh Kantilal Patel and Dilip Kantilal Patel) of charges under IPC Sections 397, 394, 201, 114 and GPS Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged dacoity case. The court determined that the complainant and eyewitness testimonies lacked credibility and failed to substantiate that the accused committed the crime, despite the police investigation and chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Sessions Court in Mehsana acquitted both accused (Alpesh Kantilal Patel and Dilip Kantilal Patel) of charges under IPC Sections 397, 394, 201, 114 and GPS Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged dacoity case. The court determined that the complainant and eyewitness testimonies lacked credibility and failed to substantiate that the accused committed the crime, despite the police investigation and chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts