THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ALPESHBHAI KANTILAL NARANDAS PATEL Advocate - N R RAVAL — 93/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 397,394,201,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJMH010035212025
Filing Number
93/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
206
Police Station
B DIVISION POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. S R PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.ALPESHBHAI KANTILAL NARANDAS PATEL Advocate - N R RAVAL
-
2.DILIPBHAI KANTILAL REVABHAI PATEL
Adv. N R RAVAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The Sessions Court in Mehsana acquitted both accused (Alpesh Kantilal Patel and Dilip Kantilal Patel) of charges under IPC Sections 397, 394, 201, 114 and GPS Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged dacoity case. The court determined that the complainant and eyewitness testimonies lacked credibility and failed to substantiate that the accused committed the crime, despite the police investigation and chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
31-Dec-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2025
Case Summary The Sessions Court in Mehsana acquitted both accused (Alpesh Kantilal Patel and Dilip Kantilal Patel) of charges under IPC Sections 397, 394, 201, 114 and GPS Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged dacoity case. The court determined that the complainant and eyewitness testimonies lacked credibility and failed to substantiate that the accused committed the crime, despite the police investigation and chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts