PATEL VINODBHAI BHAGVANBHAI vs DIED — 295/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJMH010033702019
Filing Number
295/2019
Filing Date
14-Oct-2019
Registration No
295/2019
Registration Date
14-Oct-2019
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL VINODBHAI BHAGVANBHAI
Adv. B.G.PATEL
-
2.PATEL HINABEN VINODBHAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIED
-
2.GANDHI ANKIT JAGDISHCHANDRA
-
3.THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD
Adv. P.C.THAKOR
-
4.JAYSWAL BALIRAM BUDHDHUKUVAR
Adv. K.K.SONI
-
5.ADITYA TIMPACK PVT LTD
-
6.CHOLAMANDALAM M S GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
Adv. N R BHAVSAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 16,45,100 compensation to each claimant in two consolidated petitions arising from a fatal 2019 highway collision. The court found the Tata Indigo Manza car driver solely negligent for driving at excessive speed, crossing the divider, and colliding head-on with an oncoming Eicher Tempo. The owner and insurer of the Tata Indigo car were held jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation at 7% annual interest, while the Tempo driver and vehicle were exonerated from liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
26-Dec-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Apr-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Dec-2024
Documentary Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
Documentary Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Documentary Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Documentary Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Jun-2024
Documentary Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-May-2024
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
19-Apr-2024
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2024
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2024
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-Dec-2023
Applicants Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Oct-2023
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Sep-2023
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Jul-2023
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-May-2023
Documentary Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Apr-2023
Documentary Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Apr-2023
Documentary Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2023
Documentary Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2023
Documentary Evidence
-
15-Feb-2023
Documentary Evidence
-
24-Jan-2023
Documentary Evidence
6th Addl District Judge
-
27-Dec-2022
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Dec-2022
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
14-Nov-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. District Judge
-
05-Sep-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. District Judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. District Judge
-
29-Jun-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. District Judge
-
09-May-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. District Judge
-
13-Apr-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. District Judge
-
04-Mar-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. District Judge
-
04-Feb-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Dec-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Nov-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Sep-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2021
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Apr-2021
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2021
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
31-Dec-2020
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
03-Nov-2020
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
07-Sep-2020
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
04-Jul-2020
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2020
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2020
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
17-Jan-2020
Written Statement/Reply
6th Addl District Judge
-
27-Nov-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 295/2019
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 16,45,100 compensation to each claimant in two consolidated petitions arising from a fatal 2019 highway collision. The court found the Tata Indigo Manza car driver solely negligent for driving at excessive speed, crossing the divider, and colliding head-on with an oncoming Eicher Tempo. The owner and insurer of the Tata Indigo car were held jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation at 7% annual interest, while the Tempo driver and vehicle were exonerated from liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts