THAKOR VINODSINH LAXMANSINH vs MODI SUBHADRABEN ARVINDBHAI Advocate - P R DESAI — 72/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJMH010022702023
Filing Number
72/2023
Filing Date
14-Jun-2023
Registration No
72/2023
Registration Date
14-Jun-2023
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
4-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAKOR VINODSINH LAXMANSINH
Adv. B M PRAJAPATI
-
2.THAKOR BHARTIBEN VINODSINH
Adv. B M PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MODI SUBHADRABEN ARVINDBHAI Advocate - P R DESAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Judgment Summary The court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants (defendants in the original case). The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision that the respondent (plaintiff) is the rightful owner of the disputed property in Vijjapur and is entitled to recover possession from the appellants, who had unlawfully entered the property. The court found that the appellants failed to appear in proceedings or present any defense despite being properly served, constituting deliberate negligence, and therefore rejected their arguments challenging the original judgment as illegal or erroneous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Judgement
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2024
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Jul-2024
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Apr-2024
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2024
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-Dec-2023
For R&P
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
For R&P
3rd Addl District Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
For R&P
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Sep-2023
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Appellant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2023
Judgment Summary The court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants (defendants in the original case). The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision that the respondent (plaintiff) is the rightful owner of the disputed property in Vijjapur and is entitled to recover possession from the appellants, who had unlawfully entered the property. The court found that the appellants failed to appear in proceedings or present any defense despite being properly served, constituting deliberate negligence, and therefore rejected their arguments challenging the original judgment as illegal or erroneous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts