VIPULKUMAR RAJENDRAPRASAD BHAVSAR PROP. OF MEET AUTOMOBILE PROPRIETOR FIRM vs SHRI MAHADEVPRASAD M. MEENA MANAGER OF BANK OF BARODA MARKET YARD BRANCH, MAHESANA Advocate - R K CHAUDHARI — 3/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,ORDER-41,RULE-1,2. Status: Final Arguments. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Final Arguments Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

COMM APL - COMMERCIAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010022492024

Filing Number

4/2024

Filing Date

18-Jun-2024

Registration No

3/2024

Registration Date

18-Jun-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,ORDER-41,RULE-1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIPULKUMAR RAJENDRAPRASAD BHAVSAR PROP. OF MEET AUTOMOBILE PROPRIETOR FIRM

    Adv. V P PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI MAHADEVPRASAD M. MEENA MANAGER OF BANK OF BARODA MARKET YARD BRANCH, MAHESANA Advocate - R K CHAUDHARI

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 15-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 09-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 01-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 25-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 30-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  10. 05-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  11. 04-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  12. 05-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  14. 04-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  15. 25-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  16. 08-Jul-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The application for stay of execution is allowed. The money decree passed by the Commercial Court, Mahesana (dated 14-05-2024) in favor of the respondent/plaintiff is hereby stayed pending the appeal, on the condition that the appellant deposits 50% of the decreetal amount within 15 days. If the appellant fails to deposit this amount, the stay will automatically be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 08-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  18. 06-Jul-2024

    Order On Interim Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  19. 27-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 18-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for stay of execution is allowed. The money decree passed by the Commercial Court, Mahesana (dated 14-05-2024) in favor of the respondent/plaintiff is hereby stayed pending the appeal, on the condition that the appellant deposits 50% of the decreetal amount within 15 days. If the appellant fails to deposit this amount, the stay will automatically be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case