BHAVESHKUMAR DHARAMBHAI PRAJAPATI-ARYAN INFRA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 252/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010014542025

Filing Number

253/2025

Filing Date

21-Apr-2025

Registration No

252/2025

Registration Date

21-Apr-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESHKUMAR DHARAMBHAI PRAJAPATI-ARYAN INFRA

    Adv. D N BAROT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

  2. 2.PATEL KISHAN RAMESHKUMAR-OMKAR CORPORATION

    Adv. S M KOTAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the criminal appeal challenging the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant (check issuer) was found guilty of dishonor of check and ordered to pay compensation. The court upheld the trial court's verdict, finding sufficient evidence that the appellant issued a check that bounced and failed to make payment despite receiving statutory notice from the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  14. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  15. 30-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  16. 22-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  17. 13-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  19. 06-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  20. 26-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  21. 28-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  22. 25-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  23. 20-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  24. 02-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  25. 07-Aug-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  26. 11-Jul-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  27. 20-Jun-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  28. 02-Jun-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  29. 23-May-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  30. 16-May-2025

    Final Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  31. 08-May-2025

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 29-Apr-2025

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  33. 24-Apr-2025

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  34. 23-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 21-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the criminal appeal challenging the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant (check issuer) was found guilty of dishonor of check and ordered to pay compensation. The court upheld the trial court's verdict, finding sufficient evidence that the appellant issued a check that bounced and failed to make payment despite receiving statutory notice from the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case