VIMLABEN NATWARBHAI PATEL vs AMITKUMAR JIVRAJBHAI BHORANIYA Advocate - C D PADSUMBIYA — 90/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJMH010008222021

Filing Number

90/2021

Filing Date

10-Mar-2021

Registration No

90/2021

Registration Date

10-Mar-2021

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIMLABEN NATWARBHAI PATEL

    Adv. K.M.RANGWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMITKUMAR JIVRAJBHAI BHORANIYA Advocate - C D PADSUMBIYA

  2. 2.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

    Adv. N.R.BHAVSAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Mahesana awarded compensation in two consolidated cases arising from a February 5, 2021 accident. A car driven negligently by Ameetkumar Jivrajbhai Bhoraniya struck a tractor, killing the driver Natvarbhai Ishwarbhai Patel and injuring his wife Vimalaben. The tribunal awarded Rs. 17,47,932 to the deceased's legal heirs (covering dependency loss, funeral expenses, and loss of consortium) and Rs. 6,10,405 to the injured wife (covering medical expenses, future income loss, and pain/suffering). Both Opponent No. 1 (driver/owner) and Opponent No. 2 (insurer Tata AIG) were held jointly and severally liable with 7% annual interest from petition date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 26-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  14. 07-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  15. 16-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  16. 25-Nov-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  17. 13-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  18. 13-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  19. 23-Jul-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  20. 13-Jun-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  21. 18-Apr-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  22. 21-Feb-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  23. 05-Jan-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  24. 24-Nov-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  25. 12-Oct-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  26. 12-Oct-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  27. 04-Sep-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  28. 04-Sep-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  29. 08-Aug-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  30. 08-Aug-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  31. 03-Jul-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 03-Jul-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  33. 01-May-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  34. 01-May-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  35. 10-Mar-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  36. 10-Mar-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  37. 10-Feb-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  38. 10-Feb-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  39. 07-Feb-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  40. 20-Jan-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  41. 03-Jan-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  42. 14-Nov-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  43. 09-Sep-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  44. 02-Aug-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  45. 23-Jun-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. District Judge

  46. 04-May-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. District Judge

  47. 01-Apr-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. District Judge

  48. 18-Feb-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. District Judge

  49. 19-Jan-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  50. 18-Dec-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  51. 12-Nov-2021

    Summons - Notice

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  52. 22-Sep-2021

    Summons - Notice

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  53. 02-Sep-2021

    Summons - Notice

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  54. 23-Jul-2021

    Summons - Notice

    5th Addl District Judge

  55. 18-Jun-2021

    Summons - Notice

    5th Addl District Judge

  56. 22-Apr-2021

    Summons - Notice

    5th Addl District Judge

  57. 12-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 10-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Mahesana awarded compensation in two consolidated cases arising from a February 5, 2021 accident. A car driven negligently by Ameetkumar Jivrajbhai Bhoraniya struck a tractor, killing the driver Natvarbhai Ishwarbhai Patel and injuring his wife Vimalaben. The tribunal awarded Rs. 17,47,932 to the deceased's legal heirs (covering dependency loss, funeral expenses, and loss of consortium) and Rs. 6,10,405 to the injured wife (covering medical expenses, future income loss, and pain/suffering). Both Opponent No. 1 (driver/owner) and Opponent No. 2 (insurer Tata AIG) were held jointly and severally liable with 7% annual interest from petition date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case