IMTIYAJBHAI DILAVARBHAI USMANBHAI KHALIFA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R K JOSHI — 273/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJMH010008042026
Filing Number
273/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
273/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
5-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206020251261
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.IMTIYAJBHAI DILAVARBHAI USMANBHAI KHALIFA
Adv. I M PATHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R K JOSHI
-
2.SAVAJIBHAI TRIKAMBHAI DHULABHAI SOLANKI(SALAT)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court rejected the accused's bail application under BNS Section 483. The accused was charged with serious offenses under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2)(3), 127(3) and POCSO Act Sections 3(a), 4(2), 7, 8, 17, and IPC Section 135 for allegedly abducting and sexually assaulting a minor girl (aged 15 years 2 months). The court found a prima facie case against the accused, noted that two co-accused remain absconding, and held that granting bail could compromise witness testimony and case integrity, therefore denying regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 273/2026
The court rejected the accused's bail application under BNS Section 483. The accused was charged with serious offenses under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2)(3), 127(3) and POCSO Act Sections 3(a), 4(2), 7, 8, 17, and IPC Section 135 for allegedly abducting and sexually assaulting a minor girl (aged 15 years 2 months). The court found a prima facie case against the accused, noted that two co-accused remain absconding, and held that granting bail could compromise witness testimony and case integrity, therefore denying regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts