THAKOR ROHITJI JIVANJI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 270/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010008012026

Filing Number

270/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

270/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206043250814

Police Station

MAHESANA TALUKA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Indian Penal Code Section 317(4),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

1.THAKOR ROHITJI JIVANJI

Adv. D L RANA

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mehsana rejected the bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 270/2026) filed under Section 483 CrPC. The applicant sought bail claiming his child required medical care and financial support, but the court found no valid legal grounds for bail as the applicant failed to demonstrate proper financial sources or genuine necessity. The court also rejected the argument that the child's medical condition justified bail, noting medical records showed no serious illness requiring the applicant's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

2nd Addl District Judge
12-Mar-2026

Order

2nd Addl District Judge
11-Mar-2026

Order

2nd Addl District Judge
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
07-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 270/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Mehsana rejected the bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 270/2026) filed under Section 483 CrPC. The applicant sought bail claiming his child required medical care and financial support, but the court found no valid legal grounds for bail as the applicant failed to demonstrate proper financial sources or genuine necessity. The court also rejected the argument that the child's medical condition justified bail, noting medical records showed no serious illness requiring the applicant's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.