PATEL BACHUBHAI DAHYABHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A S MAKWANA — 268/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJMH010007912026
Filing Number
268/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
268/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
3-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206020260218
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL BACHUBHAI DAHYABHAI
Adv. I M PATHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A S MAKWANA
-
2.JIGNESHKUMAR RAMANBHAI MADHAVLAL PARMAR
Adv. M R GURJAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court (5th Additional Sessions Judge, Mahesana) granted bail to the accused Patel Bachuobai Dahyaobai in a case involving charges under BNS sections 108, 308(2), 352(3), 352(2), SC/ST Atrocities Act sections 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(5), and Gujarat Finance Act sections 5, 39, 40, 42(a). The court found that the investigation was substantially complete, the accused's last contact with the deceased was over four months prior, and the suicide note's signature differed from the accused's writing, while considering the accused's advanced age and lack of criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 268/2026
Summary The court (5th Additional Sessions Judge, Mahesana) granted bail to the accused Patel Bachuobai Dahyaobai in a case involving charges under BNS sections 108, 308(2), 352(3), 352(2), SC/ST Atrocities Act sections 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(5), and Gujarat Finance Act sections 5, 39, 40, 42(a). The court found that the investigation was substantially complete, the accused's last contact with the deceased was over four months prior, and the suicide note's signature differed from the accused's writing, while considering the accused's advanced age and lack of criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts