HARSHADKUMAR PRAHLADBHAI CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 266/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010007842026

Filing Number

266/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

266/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARSHADKUMAR PRAHLADBHAI CHAUHAN

    Adv. R K CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

  2. 2.SHRI ABDULKADIRKHAN R PATHAN-KOGTA FINANCIAL(INDIA)LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Mahesana allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 95 days delay in filing a criminal appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prioritizing the right to appeal on merits over technical procedural grounds. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 3,500 to be deposited with the original complainant and directed the registry to register the appeal after verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Mahesana allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 95 days delay in filing a criminal appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prioritizing the right to appeal on merits over technical procedural grounds. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 3,500 to be deposited with the original complainant and directed the registry to register the appeal after verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case