RADHUBHA ALIAS SHAKTI MANGAJI KUBERSANG SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 263/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJMH010007752026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
263/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
263/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206077260037
Police Station
MODHERA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RADHUBHA ALIAS SHAKTI MANGAJI KUBERSANG SOLANKI
Adv. H V JOSHI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of the accused charged under IPC Sections 108, 351(3), 351(2), 54, and the Gujarat Money Lending Act. The court found that the accused had charged exorbitant interest (10-20% monthly) on loans and allegedly harassed the deceased victim, ultimately driving her to suicide. Given the serious nature of the charges, the strong evidence of conspiracy and threats, and the fact that the investigation was still ongoing, the court determined that granting bail would not be appropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of the accused charged under IPC Sections 108, 351(3), 351(2), 54, and the Gujarat Money Lending Act. The court found that the accused had charged exorbitant interest (10-20% monthly) on loans and allegedly harassed the deceased victim, ultimately driving her to suicide. Given the serious nature of the charges, the strong evidence of conspiracy and threats, and the fact that the investigation was still ongoing, the court determined that granting bail would not be appropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts