RADHUBHA ALIAS SHAKTI MANGAJI KUBERSANG SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 263/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010007752026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

263/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

263/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206077260037

Police Station

MODHERA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 108,351(3),351(2),54,
GUJARAT MONEY LANDERS ACT, 2011 Section 40,42(A),

Petitioner(s)

RADHUBHA ALIAS SHAKTI MANGAJI KUBERSANG SOLANKI

Adv. H V JOSHI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

25-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

ORDER

23-03-2026

HEARING

20-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of the accused charged under IPC Sections 108, 351(3), 351(2), 54, and the Gujarat Money Lending Act. The court found that the accused had charged exorbitant interest (10-20% monthly) on loans and allegedly harassed the deceased victim, ultimately driving her to suicide. Given the serious nature of the charges, the strong evidence of conspiracy and threats, and the fact that the investigation was still ongoing, the court determined that granting bail would not be appropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of the accused charged under IPC Sections 108, 351(3), 351(2), 54, and the Gujarat Money Lending Act. The court found that the accused had charged exorbitant interest (10-20% monthly) on loans and allegedly harassed the deceased victim, ultimately driving her to suicide. Given the serious nature of the charges, the strong evidence of conspiracy and threats, and the fact that the investigation was still ongoing, the court determined that granting bail would not be appropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case