KISHANKUMAR VASIBHAI KUMBHAR vs SHRI HARDIK SUNILKUMAR THAKAR-H.D.F.C.BANK LTD. Advocate - J P TRIVEDI — 102/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010007732026

Filing Number

102/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

102/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHANKUMAR VASIBHAI KUMBHAR

    Adv. P L PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI HARDIK SUNILKUMAR THAKAR-H.D.F.C.BANK LTD. Advocate - J P TRIVEDI

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. S R PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Sessions Court at Mahesana allowed the appellant's criminal appeal and acquitted him from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after both parties reached a compromise settlement. The court quashed the earlier conviction judgment dated 03.02.2026 and disposed of the appeal as "Compromised," following Supreme Court guidelines that permit compounding of offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Mahesana allowed the appellant's criminal appeal and acquitted him from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after both parties reached a compromise settlement. The court quashed the earlier conviction judgment dated 03.02.2026 and disposed of the appeal as "Compromised," following Supreme Court guidelines that permit compounding of offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case